Post-Quantum Key Orchestration
DainamiqQuantum computers break one thing in your network. We replace exactly that.
Your encryption is fine. Your key exchange is the part a quantum computer can break — and the part adversaries are recording today to break later. Dainamiq is the key-management layer that swaps it out, without touching the rest of your network.
What you deploy
A key-management entity that sits beside your gateway.
Dainamiq is a Key Management Entity — software you run at each site, next to the IPsec / MACsec / VPN gateway you already own. Your gateway asks it for keys over ETSI GS QKD 014, the standard it already speaks. Dainamiq answers with post-quantum keys today — ML-KEM-768, NIST FIPS 203, no special hardware — and with quantum-physical keys on the links where you've installed quantum hardware. You point the gateway at our URL. Same gateway, same tunnel; nothing else changes.
Post-quantum, everywhere
Software only, every site. ML-KEM-768 key delivery through the API your gateways already speak — no quantum hardware required.
Add quantum where it's worth it
Install quantum hardware on your crown-jewel links and those sites upgrade automatically. One platform serves both tiers.
For open-source stacks, a lightweight daemon bridges ETSI 014 to the IPsec layer. The integration surface is small by design: point the gateway, keep everything else.
Is this you?
You already have the problem. The only question is your timeline.
You run sensitive traffic over leased or dark fiber
Settlement, trading, inter-datacenter replication, backhaul — between sites, over fiber you don't fully control.
Your secrets have a long shelf life
Financial, health, IP, or state data still sensitive in 10–20 years is exactly what harvest-now-decrypt-later is banking on.
You have a mandate — or a board asking
CNSA 2.0, NIST FIPS 203, DORA, OMB M-23-02, PCI DSS 4.0. Someone wants your post-quantum plan.
You can't rip and replace
You run IPsec / MACsec at scale and need post-quantum key exchange without touching the gateways you already own.
Why it matters
Your encryption isn't the problem. The handshake in front of it is.
AES-256 is not vulnerable to quantum computers — the tunnels, the wire, the encryption are all fine. The one thing that breaks is how your devices agree on keys: every IPsec, MACsec, and VPN session starts with a key exchange (Diffie-Hellman, RSA, ECDH), and a large enough quantum computer breaks all three.
Adversaries are recording encrypted traffic now, betting they can recover the keys later — harvest now, decrypt later. NIST spent eight years choosing replacements; that is the entire scope of the quantum threat to network security. Everything else is already quantum-resistant. The only question is how to replace the one vulnerable piece without rebuilding everything around it.
Five guarantees
Built for the people who have to prove it, not just claim it.
Harvest-now protection on your backbone
The vulnerable key-exchange step is replaced with one grounded in physics, not a hardness assumption. The keys feed AES-256 — which was never the problem. No step in the chain is left for a future quantum computer to break.
Eavesdropping shows up
Tap the quantum fiber between two sites and the error rate spikes — a consequence of measuring a quantum state, not a software heuristic. Classical networks cannot offer this.
No silent downgrade
If the quantum link degrades, Dainamiq does not quietly hand back weaker keys. It refuses the request and says why. Silent fallback is how downgrade attacks work — we designed it out. You set the policy; the system enforces it without exception.
One deployment, graduated by sensitivity
Settlement traffic gets the highest tier; audit logs a lower one; monitoring the baseline — all from the same API and policy engine. Each request states what it needs and gets exactly that, or an explicit refusal.
A provenance record for every key
Each key carries how it was derived, which nodes handled it, at what posture, and when. An auditor can reconstruct any key's full lifecycle — the difference between “we use quantum keys” and “here is the evidence.”
Provenance travels with the key. When a key crosses multiple backbone segments, the record carries the posture at each hop — so the consumer can evaluate the effective security, the weakest link in the chain, against its own requirement.
Hardware-agnostic by design. The platform abstracts over quantum hardware vendors and approaches. As the market matures, you swap a driver, not the platform. No lock-in.
Start with two sites
Quantum where it's worth it. Post-quantum everywhere else. Automatic upgrades.
Quantum hardware is scarce and bound to fiber paths — you won't run quantum links to every branch, and you don't need to. Deploy a Dainamiq KME at each end of your two most sensitive, dark-fiber-connected sites; those two now have quantum-secured key exchange. Every other site gets post-quantum keys — ML-KEM-768, NIST-standardized (FIPS 203) — through the same API. As you add quantum links, sites upgrade themselves — no software change, no re-architecture.
Same software at every site, same API at every gateway — the quantum hardware is the variable, never the platform.
The honest version
What this does, and what it doesn't.
It secures the link, not the endpoint
The quantum guarantee holds on the fiber between two key-management entities. Inside your own LAN, conventional security takes over. We protect the hop you can't fully control — the one crossing cities over shared fiber.
Trusted relay is a real trust boundary
Where two sites lack a direct quantum link, a third bridges them and handles key material. We contain it — the bridge never sees plaintext, the relay hop is itself quantum-encrypted — but it's an honest limit until quantum repeaters exist commercially. They don't yet.
Post-quantum is the floor, not a compromise
ML-KEM-768 solves the same vulnerable step QKD does, using math instead of physics. It's the responsible baseline. The quantum tier adds a guarantee that rests on no hardness belief. Both are real protection; they differ in the basis of the claim.
We're early, and we'll say so
The platform is built and demonstrated against physics-based simulation. Validation against production quantum hardware is ahead of us, not behind us.
Verify it yourself
We practice what we sell.
The connection you're reading this over negotiated a post-quantum key exchange at the edge. The seal in the corner measures your own browser's handshake with us, live — green means your browser completed a post-quantum handshake; muted means it didn't.