Post-Quantum Compliance Infrastructure
DainamiqProve your cryptography is compliant. Continuously.
Regulators and boards want to know which algorithms protect what, where, and since when, and they want evidence rather than assurances. Dainamiq is the neutral control plane for an institution’s cryptography: it shows where every key and signature stands, predicts what a change will break before anything moves, tracks the migration your teams run, and records every step in a tamper-evident log your auditor verifies without trusting us.
The clock is running
Set-and-forget cryptography is over.
For twenty years you picked algorithms, provisioned keys and left them running. Now your cryptography has to be agile, auditable, and quantum-safe at once, and the people examining you want to see which algorithms protect what, where, and since when. Nothing in the stack was built to prove all three.
New national-security system acquisitions must be CNSA 2.0 compliant.
Post-quantum key establishment.
Post-quantum digital signatures.
Executive Order 14412 (June 2026) sets the 2030 and 2031 deadlines; NSA’s CNSA 2.0 sets the 2027 date for national-security systems. The mandates set your clock. The evidence is how you show you met it.
Check your edge
See where your public edge stands against the deadlines.
Check any domain
Point our probe at any site and see where its public edge stands against the 2030 and 2031 EO deadlines. A failing result means adversaries can record its traffic today and break it later.
This checks the public web edge — the TLS that terminates your site (often a CDN or load balancer) — not your backbone, email, or internal key exchange. It's the accessible proxy for the same threat.
Where we fit
The gap isn’t a missing algorithm. It’s a missing layer.
Every HSM and firewall vendor is shipping post-quantum algorithms inside its own box. That’s real, and it’s where your keys will live. What none of them can offer is a neutral view across all of them, or evidence an auditor can rely on, because that has to come from a party that doesn’t sell the hardware. Those two layers are Dainamiq.
A signed, Merkle-rooted record of every change to your keys and signatures, which your auditor verifies without trusting us, and certifies.
One vendor-neutral layer over every HSM and key consumer: policy for which algorithms and modules each asset may use, a dry run before every change, and no silent downgrade. A hardware vendor can't be neutral across its competitors' gear.
The major enterprise HSM families (Thales, Entrust nShield, AWS CloudHSM, Utimaco, Securosys) and the firewalls that already speak ETSI 014 (Juniper, Fortinet, Palo Alto). The cryptography runs here, and the plane shows which modules are validated for post-quantum and which aren't yet.
What you get
Built for the people who have to prove it, not just claim it.
Evidence your auditor verifies without trusting us
Every change to a key or signature, every policy decision and every posture change is recorded in order, committed under Merkle roots and signed with ML-DSA. Your auditor confirms what happened, and that nothing was altered or removed, from the record alone. The evidence examiners ask for, from day one.
Predict before anything moves
A dry run resolves every consumer of a key and shows which will break before anything changes. A canary signature over a harmless payload confirms each one, with zero production impact.
Validated, not just supported
An HSM that runs ML-DSA in firmware isn't necessarily validated for it. The plane reads what each of your modules can do inside its FIPS 140-3 boundary, and plans each key only where your policy allows.
Nothing degrades silently
A change that would put a key below your required posture, or retire a key a consumer still depends on, is refused with the reason. The old key stays until every consumer verifies the new one.
Crypto-agility, measured
Every asset carries a signed history of each change to its cryptography, how long it took, and what the next one will cost. When the next algorithm lands, you know your agility instead of guessing it.
Vendor-neutral by design
One plane across the major HSM families, over the standard interfaces they already speak. Evidence an auditor relies on has to come from a party that doesn't sell the hardware. No lock-in, including to us.
Through the migration
Your teams do the migration. We make it visible, safe and provable.
Know
Your estate as the plane sees it: what flows through us, your HSM fleet, and the CBOM from the discovery tool you already use. Every asset says how we know what we know.
Predict
Before a key changes, the dry run shows every consumer it touches, which will fail, and which of your modules can hold the new key inside a validated boundary.
Track
Every blocker has an owner and an estimate. It closes only when the plane re-verifies the fix, and the burndown shows whether you'll make the deadline.
Prove
Each step lands in a signed, replayable record, including what's still open. Your auditor verifies it and certifies the result.
Is this you?
You already have the problem. The only question is your timeline.
You have a mandate, or a board asking
EO 14412, CNSA 2.0, NIST FIPS 203, DORA, PCI DSS 4.0. Someone wants your post-quantum plan, with a date on it.
You're a federal contractor or agency
A PQC migration plan is due under OMB M-26-15 / EO 14412: key establishment by 2030, signatures by 2031. Post-quantum and provable, on a federal clock.
Your secrets have a long shelf life
Financial, health, IP, or state data still sensitive in 10–20 years is exactly what harvest-now-decrypt-later is banking on.
Your migration can't stop the business
Post-quantum migration is bespoke work across systems you can't pause, competing with the feature roadmap. You need to see where it stands, what's blocking it, and what it's costing.
What we do, and what your auditor does
We produce the evidence. Your auditor certifies it.
We produce the evidence; your auditor certifies it
That separation is what makes the evidence worth anything. We record what happened; the judgment about whether it meets your obligations belongs to your auditor or examiner.
Your teams run the migration; we make it visible, safe and provable
Re-architecting systems for post-quantum is bespoke, and it belongs to the teams who own those systems. We show them what will break, gate what isn't ready, and verify each fix before the old key retires.
The cryptography runs in your certified modules
Keys are generated and used inside your HSMs' validated boundaries. The plane tracks which module holds which key, whether that module is validated for its algorithm, and every change made to it.
Research
Quantum networking is our research arm.
Our quantum key distribution engine, FPGA-accelerated error correction and quantum entropy work are where the plane’s next sources come from. Each joins the same policy and the same evidence record when the hardware is ready to deploy.
We practice what we sell
The seal in the corner is live.
The connection you’re reading this over negotiated a post-quantum key exchange at the edge. The seal in the corner measures your own browser’s handshake with us, live — green means your browser completed a post-quantum handshake; muted means it didn’t.